Absolutely. I see peer review as a way of - hopefully - filtering out the most egregious crap, and fixing the worst errors in papers while rounding them off.
I feel all these debates are kind of pointless, because no-one I know treats a published article as gospel. We make up our own minds about the paper.
I feel all these debates are kind of pointless, because no-one I know treats a published article as gospel. We make up our own minds about the paper.