Comment

Comment by Yen

> then what does it matter which is which?

because implementation details matter, like the given example, demonstrating the ability to factor large numbers, without giving away the algorithm that does so.

In this case, we've defined a function, PrimeFactor(x), which returns the prime factorization of x.

you can write a naive program that computes PrimeFactor(x) by brute force. it will be slow but it will work. let's call this ProgramA.

let's say I write a magic, genius program that computes PrimeFactor(x) in constant time. This is ProgramB.

Given ProgramA, and ProgramB, you can correctly assert that ProgramA(x) == ProgramB(x) for all x.

If you ran A and B through a indistinguishability obfuscator to obtain ObfuscatedProgramC and ObfuscatedProgramD, the assertion that C(x) == D(x) holds, but you'd have no way of telling whether C comes from A or B (apart from runtime, which is ignored here)

By the same token, you couldn't tell if C and D both came from A, or both came from B, or any other possible program that correctly computes PrimeFactor(x).

so in theory, an indistinguishability obfuscator allows someone to know what a program computes, but not how it computes it, and implementation can matter a great deal.

parent Yen 13 years ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton