Did anyone else feel like the description of people's appearance was judgmental? Maybe I'm reading too much into it.
Edit: After a second reading, I think I've cracked it. The author is describing Karp as currently immature, but gradually developing into CEO material. So the descriptions separate each aspect of his appearance and personality into "immature", "developing", or "CEO-like".
Edit: After a second reading, I think I've cracked it. The author is describing Karp as currently immature, but gradually developing into CEO material. So the descriptions separate each aspect of his appearance and personality into "immature", "developing", or "CEO-like".