I'm not really sure what to make of this response.
> The Bayesian says, "Uncertainty exists in the map, not in the territory. In the real world, the coin has either come up heads, or come up tails. Any talk of 'probability' must refer to the information that I have about the coin—my state of partial ignorance and partial knowledge—not just the coin itself.
See, QM doesn't actually work like this. There is no hidden variable. This has been proven[1].
> The Bayesian says, "Uncertainty exists in the map, not in the territory. In the real world, the coin has either come up heads, or come up tails. Any talk of 'probability' must refer to the information that I have about the coin—my state of partial ignorance and partial knowledge—not just the coin itself.
See, QM doesn't actually work like this. There is no hidden variable. This has been proven[1].
[1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell%27s_theorem