There's this sort of idea that I can't wrap my head around, which is that if there's this fact A, and you don't like it, you can somehow make it not true by... explaining in detail why it is true. OK, so EE has its reasons for doing what developers didn't like... the end result is still that developers didn't like it. You explained that fact quite well, but I'm at a loss as to how that's supposed to translate into a negation of what you just explained.
I see this argument pattern bizarrely often online. It boggles my mind.
I see this argument pattern bizarrely often online. It boggles my mind.