Comment Comment by rgbrenner There's no debate. The CDDL has never been compatible with the GPL... and CDDL'd code will never be a part of the kernel.http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#CDDLhttp://www.groklaw.net/articlebasic.php?story=20041205023636...http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20050205022937327In this link Linus talks about loadable module licensing.. gives an example of AFS, which he says he did not think counted as a derived work (and therefore did not need to be licensed under the GPL).. very similar to the ZFS case.https://lkml.org/lkml/2003/12/3/228 parent rgbrenner 13 years ago
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#CDDL
http://www.groklaw.net/articlebasic.php?story=20041205023636...
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20050205022937327
In this link Linus talks about loadable module licensing.. gives an example of AFS, which he says he did not think counted as a derived work (and therefore did not need to be licensed under the GPL).. very similar to the ZFS case.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2003/12/3/228