> John LaForge, who writes for Nukewatch, correctly notes that there is no "safe" level of exposure to radioactivity.
We don't know that. Not only there may be a safe level of exposure, there may be a beneficial level[1]. Any rigorous experiment would be obviously unethical so we're just guessing here.
We don't know that. Not only there may be a safe level of exposure, there may be a beneficial level[1]. Any rigorous experiment would be obviously unethical so we're just guessing here.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_hormesis