> According to many, including the FSF, GNU, Stallman and myself, increasing access to the source code for everyone is increasing freedom.
Once released freely, the source code never stops being free, so I don't really know what they're talking about in terms of "freedom". MIT licensed code is almost infinitely free, it will never stop being free, and nobody can take it away from you.
It seems to me that they're interested in forcing other people's source code to be free.
Once released freely, the source code never stops being free, so I don't really know what they're talking about in terms of "freedom". MIT licensed code is almost infinitely free, it will never stop being free, and nobody can take it away from you.
It seems to me that they're interested in forcing other people's source code to be free.