As much as I can understand you being upset that Chrome shows a warning for your site, I don't think that the approach they are using is unreasonable.
I'd take bets that those criteria show a correlation to phishy sites. Especially if you combine those metrics together.
Is it perfect? No. Does it produce false positives? Yes. Is it beneficial on average? I think so.
PS: Since you have found the relevant file in the open source project (or 'kiddie playground' - as you like to call it), why don't you supply a superior implementation with less "foolish" measures?
I'd take bets that those criteria show a correlation to phishy sites. Especially if you combine those metrics together.
Is it perfect? No. Does it produce false positives? Yes. Is it beneficial on average? I think so.
PS: Since you have found the relevant file in the open source project (or 'kiddie playground' - as you like to call it), why don't you supply a superior implementation with less "foolish" measures?