Comment Comment by chad_walters The title is not just misleading -- it is just plain wrong.NUMA was 15% better for Gmail and 20% better for the Web search frontends, as indicated by the reductions (improvements) in CPI for these workloads.There were some workloads where NUMA did degrade performance, such as BigTable accesses (12% regression). parent chad_walters 13 years ago
NUMA was 15% better for Gmail and 20% better for the Web search frontends, as indicated by the reductions (improvements) in CPI for these workloads.
There were some workloads where NUMA did degrade performance, such as BigTable accesses (12% regression).