Wow, that's harsh. This is the part of the article that speaks to why I submitted it to HN:
"He says science, not religion, resurrected the afterlife. Advances in cardiopulmonary resuscitation meant that patients who would have died were revived, and many had stories to share."
Regardless, I don't see why you consider it a "garbage article". It seems well-written to me.
"He says science, not religion, resurrected the afterlife. Advances in cardiopulmonary resuscitation meant that patients who would have died were revived, and many had stories to share."
Regardless, I don't see why you consider it a "garbage article". It seems well-written to me.