> It's cultiavating a culture of "It's OK to have no security"
This is how the rest of our culture works. If you leave your door unlocked and somebody robs your house, we charge that person with robbery and put them in jail. We might shake our head at your naivete, but you won't get in trouble for having lax security.
If the tech community wants this standard to change when dealing with intellectual property, we need to articulate why and get people on board, because it's certainly not the default in either our current culture or our current laws.
This is how the rest of our culture works. If you leave your door unlocked and somebody robs your house, we charge that person with robbery and put them in jail. We might shake our head at your naivete, but you won't get in trouble for having lax security.
If the tech community wants this standard to change when dealing with intellectual property, we need to articulate why and get people on board, because it's certainly not the default in either our current culture or our current laws.