Comment by mh-

unfortunately the confusing licensing circumstances will probably hamper some of the interest in this.

i'm not opposed to commercial licensing, it's just that the existing combination of options doesn't offer clear legal guarantees.

if you go to the website, the split-licensing is apparent - yet has issues with, what seems like, improper use of Creative Commons licensing.

if you go to the github repo, the only license presented is AGPLv3.

are people who find the repo on github directly at risk of violating the license?