First, you imply that underlying intention behind the Fiber deployment in Provo is to make surveillance a piece of cake by practically serving up data on a platter. You admit no other possibility, since this "only helps support" your thesis.
Then someone calls you on it, and you back off and say you weren't implying anything, just that [the NSA] has an interest in building up infrastructure there.
Did you even consider the possibility that both parties might be coincidentally interested in Provo for entirely different reasons?
Then someone calls you on it, and you back off and say you weren't implying anything, just that [the NSA] has an interest in building up infrastructure there.
Did you even consider the possibility that both parties might be coincidentally interested in Provo for entirely different reasons?