I don't think the GP is criticizing the article, he's using the article to criticize Rails. Not so much "nothing to see here" as "well, what did you expect from Rails?".
(I'm explaining what I think the GP meant, not my position; I'm an old Perl guy, still undecided on the overall trade-offs offered by Rails)
(I'm explaining what I think the GP meant, not my position; I'm an old Perl guy, still undecided on the overall trade-offs offered by Rails)