Comment

Comment by ars

Hmm, actually beats a CFL - although not by much, the CFL uses 11 watts, this uses 9.5.

But the CFL costs $1, this costs $13.

It lasts 3 times as long, but still - unless you really need great color accuracy (i.e. CRI), I can't see myself buying this. (I'm comparing to a CFL with the same warm color temperature.)

Edit: CRI of 80! That's worse than the CFL I'm comparing it to!

Why would anyone want to buy this? The small boost in energy efficiency is not worth the $10.

parent ars 13 years ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton