> It’s also common to put all your types into one module named Types, as you tend to use types from every module
Is that true? Wouldn't that mean that typical Haskell applications aren't very modular, if every module needs access to all types? How can this be a good thing?
[I'm not good with Haskell; I sort of like it, but it makes me feel rather unintelligent.]
Is that true? Wouldn't that mean that typical Haskell applications aren't very modular, if every module needs access to all types? How can this be a good thing?
[I'm not good with Haskell; I sort of like it, but it makes me feel rather unintelligent.]