> 1. Probably 75% of new startups are using rails, and rightly so. You'd need a good reason not to use it. "Rusty slow legacy systems" - what nonsense.
75%? Evidence? You are the one who is talking nonsense, sorry to be direct and getting on Reddit level but you started.
> 2. If there was a better language, they'd probably learn it? Or are you trying to insinuate Ruby programmers are dumb/lazy?
Do I really have to tell you? Instead of doing some research Rubyists still defend their old tech (like you do now).
> 3. If you are blaming your slow web page on Ruby, you're doing it wrong.
Yes you are right, and now get back in your comfort zone and code some slow web services.
75%? Evidence? You are the one who is talking nonsense, sorry to be direct and getting on Reddit level but you started.
> 2. If there was a better language, they'd probably learn it? Or are you trying to insinuate Ruby programmers are dumb/lazy?
Do I really have to tell you? Instead of doing some research Rubyists still defend their old tech (like you do now).
> 3. If you are blaming your slow web page on Ruby, you're doing it wrong.
Yes you are right, and now get back in your comfort zone and code some slow web services.