> The anti-technology counter-culture is pretty widespread already.
Your anti-technology example isn't really an anti-technology example.
> I don't have a facebook page because of their policies and attitude toward privacy.
But your not having a Facebook page isn't an objection to technology, it's an objection to Facebook's privacy policies, which isn't a technological issue.
> And that is 'anti-technology lite'.
Not really. If you were unwilling to have an airplane-style black box in your car that recorded your every move, would that choice be based on your attitude toward privacy, or your attitude toward technology?
If you were the leader of an Al-Qaeda cell in Pakistan, would you refuse to use a satellite telephone because (a) you didn't want to be blown up by a drone strike, or (b) you were against modern technology?
Not all rejections of technology are based on a rejection of the technology itself -- there are other equally valid reasons.
Your anti-technology example isn't really an anti-technology example.
> I don't have a facebook page because of their policies and attitude toward privacy.
But your not having a Facebook page isn't an objection to technology, it's an objection to Facebook's privacy policies, which isn't a technological issue.
> And that is 'anti-technology lite'.
Not really. If you were unwilling to have an airplane-style black box in your car that recorded your every move, would that choice be based on your attitude toward privacy, or your attitude toward technology?
If you were the leader of an Al-Qaeda cell in Pakistan, would you refuse to use a satellite telephone because (a) you didn't want to be blown up by a drone strike, or (b) you were against modern technology?
Not all rejections of technology are based on a rejection of the technology itself -- there are other equally valid reasons.