> You're misunderstanding, probably intentionally. GP is not upset on behalf of the cold lunch or the person receiving it. They're saying this is a stupid way to protest.
I understood this
> It had no benefit to anyone, brought no attention to what she was upset about
“Stopping in front of the robots, Marvin said, led to productive conversations with other passersby who asked what she was doing.”
> which is moronic anwyays - being mad that robots are taking the "jobs" of DD/UE "workers" is completely misunderstanding the issue
I intentionally did not express an opinion on the merits of her complaints
I understood this
> It had no benefit to anyone, brought no attention to what she was upset about
“Stopping in front of the robots, Marvin said, led to productive conversations with other passersby who asked what she was doing.”
> which is moronic anwyays - being mad that robots are taking the "jobs" of DD/UE "workers" is completely misunderstanding the issue
I intentionally did not express an opinion on the merits of her complaints