> No. Capitalism is supposed to be a rejection of this kind of central planning attitude
It is not. Capitalism allow you to have any attitude, and you totally can sit in an armchair and think around about how it would be grate if all the people give away their chips to you because that would be more effective.
The distinction in the action. Capitalism only allow you to outbuy an average 80 IQ call of duty enjoyer of their chips. Under socialism the same thought process lead to government decree that banns personal computers selling, and your average call of duty enjoyer will have two weak to send their old pc to Sam Altman to decide if there is in it any useful chips or not. Because Sam Altman decided that that is the more effective way to redistribute the chips, so obey or be ready to gulag, you dirty bourgeois pig.
It is not. Capitalism allow you to have any attitude, and you totally can sit in an armchair and think around about how it would be grate if all the people give away their chips to you because that would be more effective.
The distinction in the action. Capitalism only allow you to outbuy an average 80 IQ call of duty enjoyer of their chips. Under socialism the same thought process lead to government decree that banns personal computers selling, and your average call of duty enjoyer will have two weak to send their old pc to Sam Altman to decide if there is in it any useful chips or not. Because Sam Altman decided that that is the more effective way to redistribute the chips, so obey or be ready to gulag, you dirty bourgeois pig.