Comment

Comment by vintagedave

What does the following mean - are they saying that, respecting this law, the property found should be used for the benefit of Pompeii today? (From callahad's link [0].)

> Both the report and the Park’s press release invoke Tacitus and the rules for property left without heirs. The report adds that this reference needs philological and legal-historical study before it is tied to the owners of this house. The measure I could trace is in Suetonius, Life of Titus 8.4, which assigns the property of those who died at Vesuvius without heirs to restoring the buried towns.

'Restoring the buried towns' - what a wonderful idea, that Pompeii's treasures were, and by tradition and respect today are, used for the benefit of the site!

The press release, Google-Translate-d, has only speculation about what happened to the residents:

> But perhaps they didn't make it, and they could be among those who, as the historian Tacitus recalls, died without an heir, and whose assets were supposedly used for the refoundation of Pompeii, which ultimately never materialized.

...which is considerably less romantic than the thought that the artifacts and property would have have the ancient law respected today.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50304156

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton