I didn't mention the code once in my reply. Code is only one aspect of reviewing a dependency. Much more important is the community and support around the tool/dependency.
When dealing with LLM output, you're getting a 1 of 1. There's no way to measure the community, number of contributors, or how maintainable it is.
When dealing with LLM output, you're getting a 1 of 1. There's no way to measure the community, number of contributors, or how maintainable it is.