I can't help but feel like this is the wrong way to interpret legislation. The Code isn't some sort of program you run to get your outcome. There's people and "intent" and societal vibes involved. Amendments end up bearing on each other, and changes to one law might change the relative weighing of it related to some other law.
It's all messy human stuff that I don't think "diff" handles all that well.
It's all messy human stuff that I don't think "diff" handles all that well.