> This just sounds like replacing working for one large corporation with working for two large corporations.
Even if that's the case, one is at least one is technically accountable to you.
I mean, I suppose you could simply a trial by getting rid of the defense attorney (instead of having two lawyers, you just have one), but I don't think any defendant would think that was a good idea. You'd get really efficient "justice" though, like in China.
Personally, I'm extremely opposed to letting the perfect be the enemy of the good. Though it seems like the union he was in could use more direct democracy or something. Having something like an "on-site steward" seems like it would be really challenging for electrical work, where I'd imagine you'd be moving from job-site to job-site frequently.
Even if that's the case, one is at least one is technically accountable to you.
I mean, I suppose you could simply a trial by getting rid of the defense attorney (instead of having two lawyers, you just have one), but I don't think any defendant would think that was a good idea. You'd get really efficient "justice" though, like in China.
Personally, I'm extremely opposed to letting the perfect be the enemy of the good. Though it seems like the union he was in could use more direct democracy or something. Having something like an "on-site steward" seems like it would be really challenging for electrical work, where I'd imagine you'd be moving from job-site to job-site frequently.