I vaguely recall an editorial, mostly in response to GWB Admin's attacks upon and politicization of science, stating that SciAm can no longer remain neutral and must defend science (and knowledge, empiricism, humanism, etc).
That's a pretty good hill to die on. And that they did.
Investigative reporting, journalism, genuine reporting requires an endowment of some sort, to free itself from the yoke of advertising.
That's a pretty good hill to die on. And that they did.
Investigative reporting, journalism, genuine reporting requires an endowment of some sort, to free itself from the yoke of advertising.