Disagree only because I think LLMs write more coherently. It had to be written by a human since it read like unadulterated doodoo. Nothing in the article can be tested for truth-value. A bunch of metaphors are invoked. Sentences like these make no sense to me.
> The returns on attention rise, and with them the incentive to pay attention.
> We might call this a cognitive industrious revolution, preceding and perhaps enabling a fuller AI industrial revolution
> The returns on attention rise, and with them the incentive to pay attention.
> We might call this a cognitive industrious revolution, preceding and perhaps enabling a fuller AI industrial revolution