> What if he's telling the truth and it wasn't him that disabled it?
Because he admitted that he was behind throttling Starlink.
> And why would Ukraine deserve any kind of warning?
Because Ukrainian lives are at stake? If you owned Starlink, would you just cripple it without warning them first? This is not some SaaS service. People died because Ukraine wasn't able to defend itself from Russian jet powered drones.
>However, from Starlink's PoV, Ukraine is using its network for military attacks on Russian civilian infrastructure
Again, Ukraine doesn't use Starlink to attack Russia. It uses it to defend itself on their own territory.
>That's a possible motivation, although speculative at this point.
Trump and Musk both said Zelenskyy needs to be replaced. Trump said it on TV and Musk on Twitter. And they also parrot Russian propaganda and claiming he won't allow elections, even though it's in Ukrainian's constitution that elections can't be held when there is a war.
Because he admitted that he was behind throttling Starlink.
> And why would Ukraine deserve any kind of warning?
Because Ukrainian lives are at stake? If you owned Starlink, would you just cripple it without warning them first? This is not some SaaS service. People died because Ukraine wasn't able to defend itself from Russian jet powered drones.
>However, from Starlink's PoV, Ukraine is using its network for military attacks on Russian civilian infrastructure
Again, Ukraine doesn't use Starlink to attack Russia. It uses it to defend itself on their own territory.
>That's a possible motivation, although speculative at this point.
Trump and Musk both said Zelenskyy needs to be replaced. Trump said it on TV and Musk on Twitter. And they also parrot Russian propaganda and claiming he won't allow elections, even though it's in Ukrainian's constitution that elections can't be held when there is a war.