I think your thought experiment is begging the question by asserting the outputs are indistinguishable.
The poster above is complaining that the actual outputs are qualitatively "not creative". That they embody a statistical norm, while creative work has more unique variance.
These two viewpoints cannot be bridged by a flourish that ignores the fundamental difference of opinion...
The poster above is complaining that the actual outputs are qualitatively "not creative". That they embody a statistical norm, while creative work has more unique variance.
These two viewpoints cannot be bridged by a flourish that ignores the fundamental difference of opinion...