Comment

Comment by program_whiz

How about everyone just ignore this completely until OAI meets publication standards? Having a bunch of people reading and revising these proofs is just going to be used to train the AI to further displace mathematicians. Collective action problem, but just saying "these proofs are indiscernable and won't be accepted" should be permitted.

A human mathematician that turned in this kind of unreadable detritus wouldn't get published, and they would be laughed away.

This is just getting unpaid volunteers to wade through the AI slop, and refine / correct it for them (assuming there are no major errors).

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton