Comment Comment by GrantMoyer > Somewhere, that line exists where the company would financially benefit, I just wish they'd actually define it.The line doesn't exists. It's most profitable for the company to repeatedly:1. Have an ad-supported tier and a no-ads tier2. Wait for most people to move to the no-ads tier3. Introduce ads into the no-ads tier4. Wait for people to get sick of ads5. Introduce a new, higher cost no ads tierThere is no threshold where it's more profitable for the company to never introduce ads at that price point. parent GrantMoyer 8 days ago
The line doesn't exists. It's most profitable for the company to repeatedly:
1. Have an ad-supported tier and a no-ads tier
2. Wait for most people to move to the no-ads tier
3. Introduce ads into the no-ads tier
4. Wait for people to get sick of ads
5. Introduce a new, higher cost no ads tier
There is no threshold where it's more profitable for the company to never introduce ads at that price point.