You said it. Depending on your knowledge of the entity producing the work, you get a different experience. In a vacuum though you'd appreciate the work for it's actual qualities which you find appealing. The potential for appreciation isn't different at all; it's just overruled by stronger feelings regarding the current trend of AI-hate vs AI-love. Like given identical works from 2 humans, if you respect human A and despise human B, then it's a near 100% certainty that you'd appreciate the work attributed to human A and find every possible fault with that attributed to human B. With a fun bit of hypocritic confusion if it's the same work with the attribution going back and forth.
Also the point about humans preferring the unique and "shiny". Human-made things will always be unique (nobody can do the same the the exact same way twice without machine help), while machine-made things are usually not unique but can be made so (and even then a generative routine used to make something unique can be replayed).
Also the point about humans preferring the unique and "shiny". Human-made things will always be unique (nobody can do the same the the exact same way twice without machine help), while machine-made things are usually not unique but can be made so (and even then a generative routine used to make something unique can be replayed).