I think you're moving goalposts. You posed this scenario, did you not:
> Start an investigation into deforestation, leading to the discovery of the deforestation caused by this datacenter?
I've provided evidence to suggest that's exactly what it was in this case. The head of the environmental department found evidence of deforestation and started an inquiry. Techspot (and many other outlets) picked it up because it mentions Google and they are a Tech publication. They provided a neutral view of the matter, sans bias. Those are the facts.
> Start an investigation into deforestation, leading to the discovery of the deforestation caused by this datacenter?
I've provided evidence to suggest that's exactly what it was in this case. The head of the environmental department found evidence of deforestation and started an inquiry. Techspot (and many other outlets) picked it up because it mentions Google and they are a Tech publication. They provided a neutral view of the matter, sans bias. Those are the facts.