> No, they used a language where the preferred way to share memory is raw pointers. That is the problem.
That's irrelevant - had they used the same approach in C#, heartbleed would still have happened. The language here makes no difference because the error is in the approach they chose which bypassed any ability for tooling or language features (such as found in C# and similar) to prevent reuse of deallocated memory.
That's irrelevant - had they used the same approach in C#, heartbleed would still have happened. The language here makes no difference because the error is in the approach they chose which bypassed any ability for tooling or language features (such as found in C# and similar) to prevent reuse of deallocated memory.