Interesting to see the author is staunchly against LLM use, not just in Decker, but in any dependencies.
> Decker has never been developed by or with the aid of any form of LLM or “genai” tool. I have no intention of using them at any point in the future. Decker’s primary external dependency is SDL, which has a firm anti-LLM contribution policy, and I will do my best to avoid or gradually replace any dependencies which incorporate slop in the future. Slop-free browsers and operating systems pose a larger challenge, but Native-Decker does support netBSD and Haiku.
It's a bit too dogmatic for my taste, and I wonder how it will age, but it's also totally reasonable to say "This is my garden, please don't propose changes that use a backhoe and dynamite".
> Decker has never been developed by or with the aid of any form of LLM or “genai” tool. I have no intention of using them at any point in the future. Decker’s primary external dependency is SDL, which has a firm anti-LLM contribution policy, and I will do my best to avoid or gradually replace any dependencies which incorporate slop in the future. Slop-free browsers and operating systems pose a larger challenge, but Native-Decker does support netBSD and Haiku.
It's a bit too dogmatic for my taste, and I wonder how it will age, but it's also totally reasonable to say "This is my garden, please don't propose changes that use a backhoe and dynamite".