As long as frameworks and languages offer some novel eval to the agents, they’ll remain advantageous for certain projects. Rust is the most obvious case, giving the agent a borrow checker.
I think the frameworks with strong batteries-included conventions also offer unique guardrails for agents building more ambitious apps. Those conventions allow for highly opinionated linters and well-worn migration paths, which become an eval advantage.
Eventually we will develop new languages and frameworks that are tailored to agents maintaining projects on epic time horizons. Until then, we can squeeze free evals out of these existing convention-laden technologies.
I think the frameworks with strong batteries-included conventions also offer unique guardrails for agents building more ambitious apps. Those conventions allow for highly opinionated linters and well-worn migration paths, which become an eval advantage.
Eventually we will develop new languages and frameworks that are tailored to agents maintaining projects on epic time horizons. Until then, we can squeeze free evals out of these existing convention-laden technologies.