Who said you were annoyed? I'm just pointing out that English is a democratic language, has no centralised institute defining correctness, and drawing borders around areas of it is completely pointless.
You're entitled to believe that some grammatical forms are "wrong" and I'm entitled to have no respect for that opinion.
I, for example, strongly dislike the change of meaning of "disinterested" to mean "uninterested", but have no illusion that there's some absolute truth of His Majesty's Royal English Language to prop up my ego.
In practice, where such institutes do exist, they trail after the language bringing the rules into alignment with it, or are utterly ignored by all but the most officious.
You're entitled to believe that some grammatical forms are "wrong" and I'm entitled to have no respect for that opinion.
I, for example, strongly dislike the change of meaning of "disinterested" to mean "uninterested", but have no illusion that there's some absolute truth of His Majesty's Royal English Language to prop up my ego.
In practice, where such institutes do exist, they trail after the language bringing the rules into alignment with it, or are utterly ignored by all but the most officious.