Comment

Comment by ImPostingOnHN

>> On the other hand, we have you.

> Appeals to authority are bad in general.

I'm appealing to the evidence, which also happens to be what the authorities say. Given that you have neither evidence nor authority in this discussion about whether Facebook's actions were accidental, your claims remain unconvincing on either count.

> I have never claimed that. Not once.

> Let's make it clear: I'm not denying that Meta engaged in "interference".

You are right, I mistakenly confused you for the other poster I replied to, who started this thread by claiming Facebook's actions were all accidental. I'm sorry.

> In 2022 the supreme court engaged in a blatantly unconstitutional censorship and political persecution campaign against Bolsonaro and the Brazilian right wing.

Was that before or after Bolsonaro attempted to overthrow the government with a coup/putsch [0][1]? Most people are not free speech absolutists in all cases, and incitement to insurrection is a common and commonly accepted exception to free speech worldwide.

0 – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022%E2%80%932023_Brazilian_co...

1 – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8_January_Bras%C3%ADlia_attack...

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton