> If you are looking to think critically, it can be an absolutely fantastic partner in that endeavor.
Joining “thinking critically” and a tool that has no truth basis is concerning. You may as well put numbers inside a raffle box and just take one out instead of using a calculator.
There’s no definition of correct that LLM tooling enforces, so how can it be a partner in thinking?
That’s the main issue with slop coding. It would be way more useful to send pseudocode out if you can. Logical semantic is always independent of programming syntax. No need to generate code.
Joining “thinking critically” and a tool that has no truth basis is concerning. You may as well put numbers inside a raffle box and just take one out instead of using a calculator.
There’s no definition of correct that LLM tooling enforces, so how can it be a partner in thinking?
That’s the main issue with slop coding. It would be way more useful to send pseudocode out if you can. Logical semantic is always independent of programming syntax. No need to generate code.