there was a wonderful wisiwyg xml editor that rendered the FO life from your xml using your xslt. syntext serna. they even open sources it in their hopes it would see some pick up.
alas that whole xml bubble moved into a business cloud, driven up there by complexity.
I think the biggest mistake of the consortia was to move from dsssl, the lisp, to xslt in unmaintainably arcane xml syntax, for a programming language that is.
does anyone here have some insight on why they went from dsssl to xslt? "because we can"?
alas that whole xml bubble moved into a business cloud, driven up there by complexity.
I think the biggest mistake of the consortia was to move from dsssl, the lisp, to xslt in unmaintainably arcane xml syntax, for a programming language that is.
does anyone here have some insight on why they went from dsssl to xslt? "because we can"?