Comment Comment by sigotirandolas My thought as well, I think this approach only works for them because:* They can afford frequent CC incidents since their value is having the best models, and 95%+ uptime is still OK-ish.* The core functionality of CC (the harness "agentic loop") is simple, an if that works then for most purposes CC works.* CC just stores a bunch of config and history files, there isn't any financial or irreversible safety loss if they mess it up once in a while.Once you work on something where a minor slipup can result in a huge real world mess, then I don't see how their approach can work. parent sigotirandolas 15 days ago
* They can afford frequent CC incidents since their value is having the best models, and 95%+ uptime is still OK-ish.
* The core functionality of CC (the harness "agentic loop") is simple, an if that works then for most purposes CC works.
* CC just stores a bunch of config and history files, there isn't any financial or irreversible safety loss if they mess it up once in a while.
Once you work on something where a minor slipup can result in a huge real world mess, then I don't see how their approach can work.