uhhh... Yes...? The 90's was a hotbed for deportations, and bill clinton spent alot of his presidency reforming immigration to be more exclusive. We had the same amount. The Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 is what set the laws and regulations. 2003 was just a reorg. abolishing those agencies would not create the same conditions as the past as the responsibility for enforcing the act was transfered to those newly created federal agencies.
So, what i should of asked is do you disagree with the immigration laws put forward in 1996? Do you believe that laws should be enforced?
Because abolishing ice is not the answer... Because now the responsibility of enforcement lies within the justice department. It seems what you seem to be saying is that our immigration law is too exclusive, and we need to give out citizenship freely, with all the benefits that comes along with that instead of deporting people and their families?
So, what i should of asked is do you disagree with the immigration laws put forward in 1996? Do you believe that laws should be enforced?
Because abolishing ice is not the answer... Because now the responsibility of enforcement lies within the justice department. It seems what you seem to be saying is that our immigration law is too exclusive, and we need to give out citizenship freely, with all the benefits that comes along with that instead of deporting people and their families?
Edit: By the way... this shit comes in cycles.