I don't have an agenda, I just don't really believe in democracy.
There's very little evidence to support the idea that ordinary people vote for what they want and therefore control the direction of the state, in the UK or any other "democratic" country.
If that were the case then why are policies consistently implemented that go against the expressed desires of the majority of the population?
Every government in every state ever is more accurately described as a regime, for me it's a morally neutral term.
The only question is whether the regime is good or not
There's very little evidence to support the idea that ordinary people vote for what they want and therefore control the direction of the state, in the UK or any other "democratic" country.
If that were the case then why are policies consistently implemented that go against the expressed desires of the majority of the population?
Every government in every state ever is more accurately described as a regime, for me it's a morally neutral term.
The only question is whether the regime is good or not