I'd encourage you to actually run this exercise! I think you'd be surprised.
I've proctored some interviews where we give people an LLM, and a fairly open problem (similar to "Build a game where you do X").
The first couple of iterations are a similar, but it diverges pretty quickly depending on where the human is focusing their attention. The logical bugs of different subsystems are a bit predictable, but the final results pretty reliably contain the "fist" [1] of the human.
Of course they're similar in the ways that all software are similar. But every human is knowledgeable and/or cares about specific things more than others, and that absolutely shows up in each iteration final product.
I've proctored some interviews where we give people an LLM, and a fairly open problem (similar to "Build a game where you do X").
The first couple of iterations are a similar, but it diverges pretty quickly depending on where the human is focusing their attention. The logical bugs of different subsystems are a bit predictable, but the final results pretty reliably contain the "fist" [1] of the human.
Of course they're similar in the ways that all software are similar. But every human is knowledgeable and/or cares about specific things more than others, and that absolutely shows up in each iteration final product.
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morse_code