Neil armstrong too should have been listened to .. and just like Tao .. he was quite virtuous, and informed and pretty special .. wont you say so ? and YET he was very vocal about expressing his skepticism about spacex before congress .. thank god his views were rejected .. or we might have missed the magnificent (and now normalised) sight of rockets landing vertically and the incredible engineering behind catching that beast of rocket with chopsticks etc etc
what im suprised about though is why arnt you and others here more suspectful of Tao's skeptisim of AI .. as Wittgenstein's ruler reminds us teh very thing we use to measure something else may itself need measuring .. so why should tao's expertise be any exception?
what im suprised about though is why arnt you and others here more suspectful of Tao's skeptisim of AI .. as Wittgenstein's ruler reminds us teh very thing we use to measure something else may itself need measuring .. so why should tao's expertise be any exception?