In percents, GDP growth per capita is going to be approximately the same as GDP growth over small time frames. The data I provided are because those are the data sets that are available. If you feel they're misleading, feel free to offer better data. I think you'll find all reliable sources say the exact same thing. The reason Ukraine doesn't conscript 18-22 is twofold. The first is because they make up a small percent of the population [1] - the pyramid there obscures the age bracket we're after, but it's in the ballpark of 2-3% of the Ukrainian population.
The second is because Ukraine is praying for a hope of having a Ukraine after the war. Ukraine had major demographic issues before the war, and is in a terminal situation now. You need to have fathers for the next generation if you want a next generation. A country without enough people will not be a country for long, regardless of land. Let alone when you're going to have social obligations towards countless individuals, perhaps in the millions, who will be crippled or suffering from the various mental and social disorders that war experience causes in people.
The rest of your post is somewhat incoherent, so it's not clear to me what you're trying to say. According to Syrskyi, Russia could deploy up to 20 million men in a general mobilization, including 5 million already with military experience or training. [2] However you want to estimate the forces Russia has deployed, it's a very small fraction of their potential in a general mobilization. And I never said what Russia has done is fine. Opposing the war does not mean cheerleading endlessly for a Ukrainian victory, especially as such is likely impossible. Russia should not have invaded, yet will benefit from the war. Such is life.
[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Ukraine
[2] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Armed_Forces
The second is because Ukraine is praying for a hope of having a Ukraine after the war. Ukraine had major demographic issues before the war, and is in a terminal situation now. You need to have fathers for the next generation if you want a next generation. A country without enough people will not be a country for long, regardless of land. Let alone when you're going to have social obligations towards countless individuals, perhaps in the millions, who will be crippled or suffering from the various mental and social disorders that war experience causes in people.
The rest of your post is somewhat incoherent, so it's not clear to me what you're trying to say. According to Syrskyi, Russia could deploy up to 20 million men in a general mobilization, including 5 million already with military experience or training. [2] However you want to estimate the forces Russia has deployed, it's a very small fraction of their potential in a general mobilization. And I never said what Russia has done is fine. Opposing the war does not mean cheerleading endlessly for a Ukrainian victory, especially as such is likely impossible. Russia should not have invaded, yet will benefit from the war. Such is life.
[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Ukraine
[2] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Armed_Forces