Then GP misrepresented the "On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots" paper, which spoke about meaning. But GP also said "meaning" several times, so no.
There's some haziness here about the difference between comprehensible output and comprehending. To put it mildly. I mean that's been the whole question for five or six years.
There's some haziness here about the difference between comprehensible output and comprehending. To put it mildly. I mean that's been the whole question for five or six years.