> It’s also just false. The good LLMs already produce output far better than the average programmer in most domains.
I hear this being repeated, but every time I've asked a LLM to come up with code without proper supervision, the result only superficially looked correct, but didn't stand up to scrutiny.
I hear this being repeated, but every time I've asked a LLM to come up with code without proper supervision, the result only superficially looked correct, but didn't stand up to scrutiny.
I wonder why our experiences differ.