I would suggest that a big part of avoiding abuse is that it leads to unexpected output. Given a model reflects its inputs, I imagine that abuse leads to unstable output as the model might then seek victim behaviours to better reflect the input.
Often abuse comes from a bad place anyway. As the programming meme goes:
> do what I want, not what I said
which can create horrific alignment issues with conflicting demands.
Often abuse comes from a bad place anyway. As the programming meme goes:
> do what I want, not what I said
which can create horrific alignment issues with conflicting demands.