I've read some of the results papers (the Einstein condensate one and the pi exponential one). I'm not an expert but it definitely wasn't AI slop. The introduction sections were particularly well framed and informative.
Also you can see in the papers where an idea is introduced but in the bibliography you can see where the foundational idea comes from. So the narratives are not unmotivated as some claim (proof without intuition claims).
Also you can see in the papers where an idea is introduced but in the bibliography you can see where the foundational idea comes from. So the narratives are not unmotivated as some claim (proof without intuition claims).